Abstract
Motor activity data allows for analysis of complex behavioral patterns, including the diagnosis of mental disorders, such as depression or schizophrenia. However, the classification of actigraphy signals remains a challenge. The main reasons are small datasets and the need for sophisticated feature engineering. The recent development of AutoML approaches allows for automating feature extraction and selection. In this work, we compare automatic and manual feature engineering for applications in mental health. We also analyze classifier evaluation methods for small datasets. The automated approach results in better classification, as measured with several metrics, and in a shorter, cleaner code, providing software engineering advantages.
Keywords
- Feature engineering
- feature selection
- activity classification
- time series
- mental disorder diagnosis
- AutoML
- actigraphy
- signal processing
MSC
62H30, 62M10, 62P15, 68T10
Cite this article
@article{cai-5731,
author = {Jakub Adamczyk and Filip Malawski},
title = {Comparison of Manual and Automated Feature Engineering for Daily Activity Classification in Mental Disorder Diagnosis},
journal = {Computing and Informatics},
volume = {40},
number = {4},
pages = {850--879},
year = {2021},
issn = {1335-9150},
doi = {10.31577/cai_2021_4_850}
}
TY - JOUR AU - Jakub Adamczyk AU - Filip Malawski TI - Comparison of Manual and Automated Feature Engineering for Daily Activity Classification in Mental Disorder Diagnosis JO - Computing and Informatics VL - 40 IS - 4 SP - 850 EP - 879 PY - 2021 SN - 1335-9150 DO - 10.31577/cai_2021_4_850 UR - https://doi.org/10.31577/cai_2021_4_850 KW - Feature engineering KW - feature selection KW - activity classification KW - time series KW - mental disorder diagnosis KW - AutoML KW - actigraphy KW - signal processing ER -
Adamczyk, J., & Malawski, F. (2021). Comparison of Manual and Automated Feature Engineering for Daily Activity Classification in Mental Disorder Diagnosis. Computing and Informatics, 40(4), 850–879. https://doi.org/10.31577/cai_2021_4_850